Well you knew I would be coming at this one. Bennett Zucker’s February 16th, 2007 Get More with No-Cost Ad Serving article in iMediaConnection throws out the notion that the value of ad servers is fading out of existence. While Bennett fails to be explicit about whether he is specifically looking at publisher ad servers or advertiser ad servers, let’s examine both from the perspective he presents.
Bennett says: “no-fee ad serving can bring about technological innovation, and better, cheaper, faster ways of getting things done online.” True, ad serving has become an increasingly commoditized service. Zedo and Mediaplex are the two biggest drives of this trend. Zedo’s approach to giving away three-months of free ad serving and then converting customers to paying clients results in very cheap ad serving. And Mediaplex is ‘buying’ business aggressively in an attempt to capture market share from DoubleClick and Atlas. It is not uncommon to see $0.05 or $0.04 CPM rates from either provider for tiered impression volumes in excess of 100M/mos. I’ve seen Mediaplex go as low at $0.035. Hard to compete with.
Zedo is easier to compete with. They are not certified to serve on as many sites, their customer service is not rated that high and their tool is buggy. Mediaplex has its issues too. I’ve gone into the competitive features of different ad servers in the past in my “How to pick an ad server series:”
“Today we assume, for example, that it costs nothing in bandwidth or storage or processing power to add new subscribers and web pages. But this notion hasn’t been widely applied yet in the realm of ad serving.” Actually Bennett, this is false. With ever-increasing files sizes, rich media and video this is the one thing that is keeping CPMs from falling lower and, in fact, this is what is starting to drive CPMs back up. Bandwidth is a fixed cost for an ad server. Granted the more bandwidth you require the better your rate, but a pipe is a pipe and you pay for the bandwidth in chunks no matter what you push through it. The operating model of an ad server is based on what sells and most ad servers have a minimum CPM that they need to cover to break-even. This number increases as the files sizes creep up. Video, especially, introduces a whole new level of bandwidth requirements like rich media. I know people paying $4 CPMs with Eyeblaster if you can believe that! Granted, they’re getting hosed.
Publisher ad servers have an interesting situation to consider, and the Google proposition is one that is knocking at their door. If Google is going to offer free ad serving in exchange for joining the AdSense network, then you do have a problem for the ad servers. This may be a very enticing offer to a publisher. Eliminate the $0.08 DFP charge and that could be worth $100K/mos or more to the publisher’s operation. It could be worth a lot more if they’re a large web site.
So how do advertiser ad servers stay in the game? For one thing, what are ad servers really all about? Is it posting ads, rotating, optimization and selection logic? Really? Come-on. There is a reason why there are out-of-the-box ad servers like Ad Juggler and freeware php-Ads-new. Okay, I think of them on the same level, you may not. Because it’s not hard to upload ads to a server and select creative and post them. Adteractive runs over 1 billion ads a month on a home-grown system. All you need is scalability. Servers. Co-location helps so that you have the security of not worrying about going down regionally and you have the load-balancing geographically and potentially internationally. Those are only subtle differences between the major ad servers and the tier-three players.
Self-managed out-of-the-box ad servers can’t get certified on the Yahoo!, AOL and MSN’s of the world because of reasons like that. So if you are using those solutions, you’re out of luck there. But that is not necessarily an issue for all advertisers.
Ad servers for advertisers are in the game for log processing and reporting. That is the meat of the game. The ability to process 70-100 million logs per ad served and return impressions, clicks, post-click events per site, site-section and placement is the heart of what ad servers do. Taken further, the better ad servers offer robust reporting and analytics that enable advertisers to cross-dissect the data to make empowering decisions. This is where some of the real differentiation comes into play.
A second place is integration. Ad servers are starting to step up and recognize that 2007 is about consolidated reporting. Drawing together disparate data sources into the dashboard. Blackfoot has been touting this for 2 years. David Smith has been challenging the industry for over a year to bring this to light. Ad servers are slowly coming to recognize that this is where they need to be.
TruEffect began a project with mOne a year ago to build a consolidated report that brought together the search, email, rich media and ad serving data under one roof, within Microsoft Excel. Nothing entirely different from what some of the other ad servers are capable of doing accept for the fact that it is active, live data that is manipulatable within a Microsoft Excel environment, instead of within a Web-based application and downloadable as .csv files.
Now I know first-hand that publishers are dissatisfied with their publisher ad serving solutions. See my post: Banner Ads on Google. And I know that there really is not a comprehensive solution out there that combines inventory management, sales management, forecasting (the wholly grail) and campaign management. So maybe Bennett can shed some light on that in a follow-up article or perhaps Brad Beren’s can find someone to write a non-self-promoting article on the state of affairs of the publisher ad serving space. But for now, the largest pubs out there are using a combination of home grown systems or a combination of DPF plus site-side analytics plus proprietary tools plus a room full of analysts; and all of them are blind more than just a couple of weeks out in terms of available inventory. Crack that code and you get an award. And a job … probably from Google.
Differentiation is key in every space, no doubt Bennett. And the key is to make those differentiations known in the industry. DoubleClick is asleep at the wheel. Atlas is focused on their purchase of Accipiter and has let their client services slip so badly that their clients are just crying for someone to come and take them away (oh Calgon!). Mediaplex is aggressive out there, no doubt. But all they have to offer is a shelf full of the features that you should already expect from an ad server and a price that is intended to undercut DC and Atlas.
And now, the plug J … TruEffect has all the features, and yes, we’re competing on the price points too. But we built the ad server within Microsoft Excel, TruAdvertiser.xls. See Maximize your Ad Traffickers’ Value, Re-Evaluate Their Time for a deep-dive into the product with screen shots and all that good stuff. I know, I named the post poorly, but there is a lot of meat in that one.
Anyway, TruAdvertiser.xls was built around the workflow of an agency or advertiser. It integrates with other aspects of the business operation, leveraging all of Microsoft Office. All aspects of the media planning, ad serving and reporting is conducted in Microsoft Excel and other disparate sources of data can easily be pulled in to create dashboard-like reports. Data can be pushed out to accounting systems or other tools like internal business intelligence reporting tools. There is not a whole lot that can’t be done with some specialize work. And we do it everyday with our clients. Okay, enough … that wasn’t bad (166 words).
So Bennett Zucker wrote us another good article. And from the publisher ad serving perspective I think he is spot-on. Commoditized pricing is an indication that there is little differentiation in the space. If it is just about price, the players are driving head-first into the ground. If someone does not crack the forecasting code it will remain a one-way ticket. Google’s attempt to throw their hat into the game with their free publisher ad server for AdSense doesn’t even bother to take a swing at it. My conversations with them last year yielded that they too didn’t have that problem solved. So if you want to win, and maybe I can help you here, launch a publisher ad server with forecasting that can look out past 2-3 weeks with a degree of accuracy that can be leveraged for selling. That is the golden egg. In terms of advertiser ad servers, it’s not about features, everyone has them and that is why the prices have fallen. Rich media, video and larger file sizes will drive the CPMs back up. Integration and consolidated reporting will keep the leaders alive if they don’t stay asleep at the wheel.
Reactionary with Insight
_uacct = “UA-980395-1″;